Best Friends Animal Society

Network Home CommunitiesIdaho News Idaho Wolves Face Massacre - Need Your Voice!
Idaho's place on the Best Friends Network More>
Prev17 of 33 stories Next
Print
Idaho

Idaho Wolves Face Massacre - Need Your Voice!

December 26, 2007 : 3:56 PM
Policy in the works to start wolf harvest - you can stop it!

The below story is part of a much bigger problem: the Federal Government has started the wheels turning to remove the wolves from the list of federally protected endangered and threatened species. The Defenders of Wildlife campaign is urging citizens to contact the Dept of the Interior! We also want to urge you, no matter where you live in the U.S., to contact them as well!

Who:
U.S. Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne
How:
Call 'em: (202) 208-7351
Email: exsec@ios.doi.gov

The following alert comes from Lynne Stone at the Boulder-White Clouds Council:

The Idaho Dept. of Fish & Game has released its wolf "population" plan that could remove hundreds of gray wolves from Idaho through hunting and trapping.

COMMENTS ARE NEEDED BY DEC. 31, 2007. The plan's most blatant problems are detailed below. I apologize for the length, but please use any or all the information to write a letter, long or short. Pass this e-mail on to other wolf supporters. I realize it's the holidays, but the best Christmas gift you could give wolves right now is to speak up and write on their behalf!

"Governor Otter sees wolves as a nuisance that must be culled. Over the past 10 years, Idaho’s wolves have shown a stunning capacity to recover. Over the next four years, their future rests with Otter -- a troubling prospect”. (Idaho Statesman 12.21.06)

How You Can Help
Write by December 31, 2007 and protest IDFG’s hunting plan. Ask IDFG to start over with a plan that represents the interests of all Idahoans, rather than a minority consisting of ranchers, outfitters and trophy hunters who have convinced Governor Otter that Little Red Riding Hood was not a fairy tale. Join with Boulder-White Clouds Council and the Wolf Recovery Foundation in our efforts on educating the public on the value of wolves to the natural landscape. Write a letter to your local newspaper and others in support of wolves and opposing IDFG's wolf killing plan.

WHERE TO WRITE
E-mail: idfginfo@idfg.idaho.gov (Put “Wolf Plan Comments” in the subject line). If you have trouble with this address, try sending again.

Mail: IDFG, Wolf Plan Comments, P.O. Box 25, Boise ID 83707

Fax: IDFG, Wolf Plan comments: 208-334-2148 or 208-334-2114

The Idaho Dept. of Fish & Game (IDFG) has released its Draft Idaho Wolf Population Mgt Plan. This is actually a hunting plan based on Idaho Governor Butch Otter's politics, rather than biology, ecology or science, and assumes most Idahoans would prefer wolves hunted with bullets rather than cameras.

The plan is on line at Fish & Game.

Background:
This is a HUNTING PLAN that could remove all but 15 breeding pairs (two adults and two pups = breeding pair) from Idaho. The plan’s minimum objective is 104 wolves. Currently there are between 700 and 800 wolves in the state. And despite what IDFG claims, there’s room for far more wolves to exist.

Are wolves really eating all the elk? Elk numbers are so high in many areas that IDFG holds elk “depredation” hunts because of rancher and farmer complaints. Elk seasons last from Labor Day to December. Idaho has over 125,000 elk and hunters killed 21,000 in 2005, the 8th largest number ever. Wolves move elk around, benefiting and healing overused foraging areas. Only two areas in Idaho are not meeting or exceeding IDFG elk number objectives and that’s due to habitat issues, not wolves.

Wolves are in for a tough and deadly time in Idaho, Montana & Wyoming if delisted from the Endangered Species Act. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s delisting decision is expected in February 2008. Wolf advocacy groups will litigate on the grounds that Delisting as proposed at this time is illegal and jeopardizes gray wolf survival in the Northern Rockies. Successful litigation could buy wolves some time until the anti-wolf Bush and Butch Administrations ride off into the sunset.

POINTS TO MAKE ON THE PROPOSED IDAHO WOLF MGT PLAN:
The hunting plan robs Idahoans of opportunities to see wolves. Wolves are one of the main attractions in Yellowstone Park and wolf watching brings over $60 million into the Yellowstone area economy. Few Idahoans will ever see a wolf if IDFG’s faulty plan goes into effect. IDFG has thrown a bone to wolf supporters saying they might consider one or two non-permanent “wolf viewing areas” as long as outfitters and ranchers agreed and were paid by non-government sources for any “losses” caused by wolves. With that type of thinking, let’s ask IDFG for reimbursement for lost wildlife viewing because of livestock use or outfitter hunting. Why is Idaho rushing into a full-scale wolf hunt, while Minnesota with over 3000 wolves, has no wolf hunt? Politics, politics - pressure from public land livestock grazers, big game outfitters, anti-predator groups and the Governor.

The Plan fails to advocate for non-lethal methods of keeping wolves and livestock apart. Wolves can learn to stay away from sheep and cattle by use of proven pro-active, non-lethal methods. Because of powerful ranchers and their ties to Wildlife Services (formerly Animal Damage Control), wolves are now rarely given a second chance to learn to fear man or stock. A few ranchers are willing to live with wolves. Others turn their sheep and cattle out on top of wolf denning areas and as a result, entire wolf packs have been killed. There are 1700 ranchers who graze on Idaho’s public lands with 10% (170) controlling 80% of public land allotments. There are 1.4 million people who reside in the state. Why should a handful of ranchers dictate whether wolves live or die? IDFG is supposed to represent all Idahoans. Please remind them of this as they revise their unbalanced wolf plan.

Wolf number objectives are absurdly low throughout the 14 state Data Analysis Units (DAUs) (See Table 6.2). Example: In the 2.3 million acre Frank Church - River of No Return Wilderness (larger than Yellowstone Park), IDFG’s objective is for ONE TO FOUR breeding pairs. Minimum wolf number objective is EIGHT. There are no cattle or sheep in the Frank. But IDFG cites “ungulate conflict” between wolves and elk. Why? We suspect it’s big game outfitters who don’t want wolves. Imagine if there was only one wolf pack in Yellowstone Pack and a total of eight wolves. That’s what IDFG is proposing for the Frank as their bottom line. Please ask IDFG to reconsider its wolf number objectives in the Frank and all the DAUs.

Southern Idaho Mountains wolf number objectives - this includes most of the White Clouds, Boulders, Pioneers, Smokys and Lost Rivers, over four million acres. Breeding pair object: ZERO TO FOUR. Minimum wolf number objective: EIGHT. Why so low? Ranchers who run cows in places like Copper Basin and the White Clouds, or sheep in the Smokys and Boulders. Protest this ridiculously low wolf number on some of the wildest land in America. Insist that IDFG’s revised plan spells out in detail a proactive, non-lethal livestock management approach.

Oppose the “harvest” of wolf families. IDFG proposes to sell wolf tags for $9.75 to anyone and the hunting season will go from Aug. 30 to March 31. Trapping would also be allowed. Imagine a wolf pack howling in sorrow as one of their members is held painfully in a trap for 48 hours until the trapper “sportsman” arrives to kill it. IDFG attempts to cover up the killing by calling it “harvest”. Don’t buy into this gibberish. Spuds are harvested. Wolves are shot. IDFG’s plan will allow wolves of all ages to be killed without any regard to the social structure of a wolf pack. IDFG’s plan is being driven by ranchers, outfitters, trappers, trophy hunters and fossilized, 1880-thinking politicians who don’t want predators, period. They do not represent all Idahoans. If a hunting season is ever established, the least IDFG could do, is start slowly and issue a few tags -- not the wholesale slaughter they are proposing.

WOLVES ARE HIGHLY SOCIALIZED PACK ANIMALS. IDFG says they will manage wolves and hunt wolves as big game just like mountain lions and black bears. Yet there are 3000 lions and 20,000 black bears in Idaho alone. There’s far fewer wolves. We’re not amused that IDFG doesn’t know the difference between the lives of wolves, bears and lions. Killing alphas and other adults in a pack and leaving sub adults and pups on their own, will lead to more conflicts between wolves and livestock. Yet the IDFG naively keeps saying their wolf killing plan will reduce conflict. The hunting season would stop just before denning season in April. By then, the alpha female may well have lost her entire pack at the time she needs them most. Then in late August, when pups are just starting to travel, the hunt begins again. IDFG should be ashamed for proposing this inhumane wolf hunting plan and needs to be told as much.

image courtesy of Wolf Park


Sign in to post a comment
Comments
  
September 5, 2008 at 8:13 PM
posted by: snowyowl13
Oh, my gosh. this is HORRIBLE!!!!! how can people do things like this????? Wolves are NOT the monsters people think them to be. they are restoring balance to Yellowstone!!!! LITTLE RED RIDING HOOD LIED!!! There has never been a recorded death of a human cause by a wolf. What we NEED to do, instead of killing all of them, is to find a better way to keep them in places where they won't harm livestock. If this Otter dude kills off wolves, he's taking a necessary part out of yellowstone--and the world. WE NEED TO STOP THIS.
  
August 1, 2008 at 6:11 AM
posted by: quella
Wyoming’s wolf management plan classifies wolves outside of the northwestern part . Idaho wolf management plans classify wolves as a game animal. Hunters who kill wolves in wyoming’s predator zone must report the time and location within 10 days. In Yellowstone National Park
25 wolf packs living outside , and seven live in the predator area.
==============
quella
Idaho Treatment Centers
  
June 23, 2008 at 3:57 PM
posted by: vantekare
I'm new to Idaho and even to the United States (Canadian) and an environmentalist which I've discovered is a four letter word in these parts. These big tough men's men pat each other on the back and boast of their hunting prowness and yet what they really want is to sterilize the great outdoors so that the only animals that exist are the non-threatening deer and elk that they proudly display on their walls. Wolves are fascinating family creatures without gile who can teach all of us a lesson on conservation and hunting for need only and not sport. I encourage everyone to read, "Never Cry Wolf" by Farley Mowat and send a copy to your anti-wolf neighbours. I have wondered if these fearsome hunters were to go to the deepest depths of Africa would they enjoy it so much if that continent had been sterilized of all "dangerous" animals. Africa without lions, tigers, snakes, etc would cease to be Africa. The United States without the animals that God placed here would not be the land that we love.
  
June 6, 2008 at 4:42 AM
posted by: LAANIMALSERVICES_CALIFORNIA
KILLING AN ANIMAL IS STUPID AND THERES REALLY NO POINT TO IT IF I MUST SAY SO MYSELF.MY SISTERS FAVORITE ANIMAL IS A WOLF AND SHE WONT LIKE THIS VERY MUCH.
  
December 27, 2007 at 10:06 PM
posted by: iamk9mom
I went to the IDFG site to read the proposal. This is in preparation for the potential delisting of the wolf from the endangered species list. Unfortunately, from looking at the US Fish & Wildlife page, their plan to delist wolves was most likely based on CURRENT management plans and not on this newly proposed plan that Idaho has come up with. We need to write to the US FWS www.fws.gov/endangered/contacts.html to voice concerns about this.
  
December 27, 2007 at 5:27 PM
posted by: QMD333
IN RESPONSE TO THIS IRRESPONSIBLE BIT OF INFO IN THE ARTICLE:

"WOLVES ARE HIGHLY SOCIALIZED PACK ANIMALS. IDFG says they will manage wolves and hunt wolves as big game just like mountain lions and black bears. Yet there are 3000 lions and 20,000 black bears in Idaho alone. There’s far fewer wolves. We’re not amused that IDFG doesn’t know the difference between the lives of wolves, bears and lions."

I SAY THIS:

Whoever wrote this should be ashamed of themselves for hinting that it is somehow "more permissible" to kill Cougars and Bears than it is to kill Wolves.
The fact is that it doesnt matter if there are 5 billion Cougars and Bears, it is still WRONG TO KILL THEM, just like it's wrong to kill Wolves.
There are billions of human animals walking the planet....does this allow us to start exterminating human animals because there is a "surplus"?
No.
So, while we are trying to save one precious species, lets not become selfish and say that its ok to kill others.
Cougars, Bears, Wolves, Humans, and all other Animals shouldnt be killed because WE ARE ALL PRECIOUS.
It's not about population. It's about LIFE. Whether there are 5 members of a species left, or 5 billion members of a species left, it is wrong to murder any living soul. It is not about numbers, it is about an INDIVIDUAL'S right to live. ONE Cougar dying is a tragedy. ONE Wolf dying is a tragedy. ONE precious Soul's life being snuffed out by numbskull humans who think that they have a right to kill is a sad tragedy.
That is the bottom line.
  
December 27, 2007 at 5:06 PM
posted by: QMD333
Once again, ignorant, arrogant humans are atop their pedestals, trying to play God, deciding who should live and who should die.

Ridiculous.
  
December 27, 2007 at 12:58 PM
posted by: njanmlrsq3
http://www.defenders.org/wildlife_and_habitat/wildlife/wolf,_gray.php

This link is information on the Grey wolf. Here is an interesting tid bite from the web page...

While wolf predation on livestock is fairly uncommon, wolves that do prey on them are often killed to protect the livestock. Some livestock owners are developing non-lethal methods to reduce the chances of a wolf attacking their livestock. These methods include fencing livestock, lighting, alarm systems and removing dead or dying livestock that may attract carnivores like wolves.

Under the *Endangered Species Act (ESA), gray wolves are listed as endangered in the lower-48 states, except for Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin and portions of the surrounding Western Great Lakes states where federal protections were recently removed. Wolves in Alaska are not listed under the ESA.
  
December 27, 2007 at 12:21 PM
posted by: cbarnes
This is just as bad and the people in other countries culling. Aren't we a civialized nation? Why is it that humans feel they just can't get along with the animals? Can I remind evryone that the animals were here first? We should all wake up because if we don't there won't be any animals left on this earth.
Welcome to the Best Friends Network!
Join the Best Friends Network today!
It’s the best place online to connect with other animal people, have fun, and help save lives in your community and all over the world. Learn More About the Best Friends Network or Join Now.
Member Log In  
Username or Email:  
Password:
 
 
   
Featured Member
stanmp34
Nice guy who likes animals I care about them and do what I can to help any...

Join a Community
San Antonio
San Antonio's place on the Best Friends Network.
Join a Campaign
Nye County Cat Rescue
Best Friends called in to assist more than 800 cats in distress in Pahrump, Nevada.

Truth about the Pet Trade

A coalition of kindness to animals caught in the pet trade.